Comments

Finding Your Social Media Voice

Posted by Whitney on May 21, 2010 in Uncategorized

I started talking to a friend the other day about this idea of “finding your voice”.  To many, it sounds like a fortune cookie, and doesn’t seem to make very much sense at all, and to others, there’s an instant resonance.  So to bridge this gap, let me explain what i mean by Finding Your Voice.

When I first started to write a book, I wrote episodically.  I’d write in long spurts, put the piece down, and come back days later, maybe adding some, maybe starting over.  When I reread the pieces to edit them together, it became apparent I had a problem with tone or voice. The mood I was in when I first sat down, or what was exciting to me at the moment colored the tone and the “voice” of what I had written, and it sounded like two different people had written sections of the chapter.  This change made the piece harder to read and pay attention to, because it felt choppy, like too many people were talking to me at the same time.

What’s interesting about this, is that if you look at some of the work of Vygotsky and other developmental psychologists, they talk about our development of our “inner voice” as a dialogue between us and the outside world.  For example, as you read this blog post, you “hear” the words in your head, as if I were sitting beside you, talking.  Our “voices” go from being external when we’re children to gradually becoming internal, although in moments of stress or difficult problem solving, we may still find that we start talking to ourselves, trying to work things out.  (This is why you can often find me asking out loud, “Where did I put those stupid car keys?” even if no one is around to answer me.)  This inner voice is real- it’s our narrator, so to speak, and this carries over to all of our modes of expression, even writing.

So back to editing-  When my writing got disjointed, it was like several different internal voices were speaking at the same time, and the flow of the work became harder to follow.  The internal voice, the narrator in our heads, was no longer one person, but several.  In order to make the piece flow and make sense, it becomes incredibly important to find that voice- that one person, so to speak, so the writing feels like a whole, not like different sentences in various typefaces, stapled together like a ransom note.

If you think of writing like music, there’s a big difference between playing the notes on a page and “making music” which requires both a flow of the notes, but an emotion as well behind the playing.  It’s why we can hear the same piece of music played by different people, but get something new out of every variation.  There’s a fluency that develops, like a child going from reading one   word   at   a   time  to reading whole sentences, to then reading with expression.  It’s the difference between reading a play and seeing it come to life with a performance of the same work.  The fluency and flow of the expression, the voice that develops, makes all the difference in whether  your writing works or whether it seems like a collection of disparate ideas with no common thread.

Now, if we apply this same concept to social media, I think companies and individuals are most successful when they find their voice.  Different people can contribute to the whole, but the common purpose needs to feel like it aligns together.  This is why when companies not known for cheeky ads try to pull one off, sometimes it succeeds, because it seems in line with the personification of the brand, and other times it fails miserably, because it runs counter to what people expect as an authentic voice of the company.

For example, Apple can get away with the “PC v Mac” ads because the personifications seem to ring true- it lines up with people’s experience and it matches what Apple has positioned itself as- an outsider.  It’s also why the whole controversy about the new iPhone is causing a stir, because it makes Apple look more like the mean establishment guys, and betrays the cool dude factor.  In contrast,  the “Im a PC and Windows 7 was my idea” while it seems very Microsoft, makes no sense to me whatsoever.  I do not believe for one second that that girl in the french cafe had anything to do with Windows 7, so the ad leaves me puzzling over what message I’m supposed to be getting here, because it seems disjointed and the meaning is lost for me.

In writing, in music, on Facebook, on Twitter, or in marketing in general, you need to find a comfortable voice that the company can use and emulate.  People have to be able to have a sense of who the company is, a personification they can identify with.  This is what makes each company unique, and why mimicry is so hard- even in real life, few people can pull off pitch perfect imitation of others.  By being ourself and finding your voice, you find why your are special and what you have to contribute.  Without this voice, you’re still like a confused teenager, trying on different personalities until they find one that seems to fit.

Don’t be that kid.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

 
Comments

Narrowcasting- Where’s the Market?

Posted by Whitney on Aug 18, 2008 in Uncategorized

Ars Technica reports that Pandora may end up going out of business, now that the fees required by SoundExchange for royalties for internet radio have increased three-fold.  Pandora is a great service, and has something called the Music Genome Project, where it recommends new artists to you based on music you already like.  It creates a whole radio station for you of music, based on an artist of genre, and will give you more music it finds of that same “type” and it’s simply fantastic.  I love this feature, and it’s like the music version of Amazon recommendations, except it’s all free.

So for example, I like the Bare Naked Ladies.  On my custom radio channel, I get Bare Naked Ladies, John Mayer, The Dave Matthews Band, and others.  On the Lyle Lovett channel, I get Lyle, Wayland Jennings, Joe Cocker, and Jack Johnson- who I had never heard of before.  I then went and purchased his album on iTunes, straight from the Pandora site.

You can decide by voting whether you like a song and want to hear more of that or less, and Pandora takes it all into account.  You essentially get to be your own program director at your own radio station- and it’s amazing.  By programming my “likes” into the service, I get more of what what I do like, I get exposed to new music, I get the radio station of my dreams, but commercial free, and it’s all so simple.

I’ve taken services like Pandora for granted.  As a podcaster, I listen to a tremendous amount of audio all the time- editing interviews, listening to other shows, and sometimes I forget how pleasant it is just to have Pandora playing in the background.  And of course, now that it is hanging on the edge, I am nervous about what I’ll do if it’s gone.

Pandora may also face problems that podcasters still face- people aren’t sure how to access all the great programming available out there, or the options available to them, because they simply don’t realize it exists.  Taking a random poll of my non-new media friends, few people really knew about Pandora, and how fantastic it is.  This tells me that it’s not that Pandora doesn’t have huge potential- it is awesome- but it needs to crack into the main stream more.  More people, like my mom, need to understand how fantastic Pandora is, in order to take advantage of what it offers.  And this requires companies to expand their advertising beyond the 20 somethings and consider other demographics, like Moms with kids.

As a Mom of a 13 and ten year old boy, kids on the verge of becoming teen music junkies, Pandora lets me plug in some of my favorite artists and find others that are of the same ilk- a perfect way for parents and kids to become exposed to music they can share together.  So for example, I can plug in Bare Naked Ladies and John Meyer, and then I also get Toad the Wet Sprocket, the Dave Matthews Band, and other artists that don’t make my ears bleed while working.  And it’s music I can “wean” my kids on, while gradually extinguishing the High School Musical style music, but not jumping them straight into  50 Cent.

Yet I am sure the idea of mixing demographics and hitting an older and more maternal audience might not be the first thing Pandora thinks about.  But the fact is that programming radio to our own tastes, beyond just the ipod is a huge innovation- I just think it is way under-appreciated. And I know a whole cadre of Moms who would love this option, especially in the car, when commercial radio stations don’t provide a format that could be described as “Family friendly” unless it is programming to really young children, like the Disney Channel.  There isn’t  much of a selection for real music programming that has a chance to meet with kid and Mom approval, while broadening both of their music tastes.

Because the beauty of Pandora’s service is under-appreciated,   Sound Exchange sees an opportunity to put Pandora out of business with the vast increase in fees.  Yet Pandora and other internet radio stations need to do their work as well, to make sure people realize why they should care if Pandora struggles- they have to work to extend their reach so more people care, write Congress, and get involved.  But you can’t get that grass root support without making sure people know why you are so important in the first place.  And this means realizing more people need your service than just hipsters-  in fact, I would bet the demographic that needs the service is more of that NPR crowd in the first place.

I hope Pandora doesn’t go away- this would be a tremendous sadness for me personally.  But I also think they need to make sure the word gets out farther than it has so far.  Because more people need to care, beyond the first wave adopter geeks like me.

Tags: , , , ,

Copyright © 2010 Reading Whitney All rights reserved. Theme by Laptop Geek.